Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Andrew Murphy & Son

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1931No. 27784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

• This proceeding involves, first, an action by the plaintifl! to compel the defendant corporation to transfer on its books to the plaintiff 5 shares of common stock, evidenced by certificate of stock No. 12, 15 shares of preferred stock, evidenced by certificate of stock No. 46, 10 shares of preferred stock, evidenced by stock certificate No. 103, 15 shares of preferred stock, evidenced by stock certificate No. Ill, and 10 shares of preferred stock, evidenced by stock certificate No. 141. These various certificates are all in due form, were duly issued by the defendant corporation, and bear…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  2. Moore v. MarkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Miller v. Farmers Milling & Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hallstead v. PerrigoNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hoctor-Johnston Co. v. BillingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Electronic Development Co. v. RobsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hiller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Preszler v. DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Farmers Underwriters Association v. EckelNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API