Legal Opinion

Land Title of Walla Walla, Inc. v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 19, 2003No. 21312-9-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

After recording a document, an auditor is instructed to “electronically transmit or deliver it, upon request, to the party leaving the same for record or to the address on the face of the document.” RCW 65.04.090. This appeal concerns a dispute between a county auditor and a title company regarding the meaning of this instruction. When a document is left with the auditor for recording, does RCW 65.04.090 obligate the auditor, if requested, to deliver *288it to the party whose address appears on the face of the document? Or, does the statute grant the auditor the discretion to return the recorded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter GoldmarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Land Title of Walla Walla, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Burd v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Burd v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API