Legal Opinion

Burd v. Clarke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 2009No. 37993-7-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

¶1 Everette Burd sought a writ of mandamus ordering Harold Clarke, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections (DOC), to complete Burd’s dangerous mentally ill offender assessment (assessment). The trial court denied Burd’s motion for summary judgment, granted DOC’s cross motion for summary judgment, and dismissed Burd’s petition. Burd appeals, arguing that RCW 72.09.370 creates a mandatory duty for DOC to perform the assessment and develop a release plan. He also argues that a former DOC internal policy entitles him to an assessment. DOC counters that this appeal is moot because DOC no…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Washington State Council v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. WASHINGTON STATE COUNCIL v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Land Title of Walla Walla, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Stevens County District Court JudgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Theodore B. Edenstrom v. Thurston County Resource Stewardship DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API