Legal Opinion
Burd v. Clarke
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 9, 2009No. 37993-7-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
219 P.3d 950 (2009)
Everette BURD, Appellant,
v.
Harold CLARKE, Secretary of Washington Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 37993-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 9, 2009.
Amanda Marie Migchelbrink, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
Roger Ival Gaer, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
HOUGHTON, J.
¶ 1 Everette Burd sought a writ of mandamus ordering Harold Clarke, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections (DOC), to complete Burd's dangerous mentally ill offender assessment (assessment). The trial court denied Burd's motion for summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Washington State Council v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- WASHINGTON STATE COUNCIL v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Washington v. Stevens County District Court JudgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Theodore B. Edenstrom v. Thurston County Resource Stewardship DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019