Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter Goldmark
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.
¶1 Hood Canal Sand and Gravel LLC (HCSG) appeals the summary judgment dismissal of its claims against the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR). HCSG claims that DNR illegally granted the United States Navy an easement over certain tidal “bedlands” in Hood Canal, which easement restricted development on the bedlands. HCSG had hoped to lease those bedlands to build a pier for its own project. The superior court dismissed HCSG’s claims against DNR on summary judgment. HCSG argues that the superior court erred because DNR’s cross motion for summary judgment suffered procedural flaws…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Waterways Operators, Resp v. Pollution Control Hearings Board,et Al, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Anti-smoking Alliance v. TPCHDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Automotive United Trades Organization, V Washington Public DisclCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.