Legal Opinion
Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 23, 2015No. 13-56602PublishedCited by 1,109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOOTE, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant, Sergio Ramirez, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint and the subsequent denial of his motion to reconsider that dismissal. In this appeal, we consider whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) required the Plaintiff, who filed his First Amended Complaint with consent of the opposing party, to seek leave of court before filing his Second Amended Complaint. This inquiry demands that we carefully scrutinize Rule 15(a)’s text to discern whether it imposes any particular timing mechanism governing the order in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,109 opinions
- Dawn Crawford v. John TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Avenue 6E Investments, LLC v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.United States District Court · 2018
1,104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.