Legal Opinion

Richard Loreto v. Procter and Gamble Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2013No. 10-4274UnpublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Richard Loreto and Larry Buffa appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims against Procter & Gamble for violation of various consumer-protection statutes. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

This proposed class action involves the charge that Procter & Gamble was unjustly enriched and violated the consumer-protection laws of all fifty States when it sold and marketed two new products in 2009: DayQuil Plus Vitamin C and NyQuil Plus Vitamin C. According to plaintiffs, the company sought to exploit the commonly held, yet…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  2. Rita McDaniel v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Counts v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. Thorn v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API