Legal Opinion

Sheehy v. Miles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1892No. 13913PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover a deposit made *292on a sale of real estate situate in the city and county of San Francisco, the plaintiff claiming the title to be defective. The condition of defendants’ title to the tract of land is the only question involved.

In the case of Turner v. McDonald, 76 Cal. 177, this court said: “A perfect title must be one that is good and valid beyond all reasonable doubt and in that case it was conceded by counsel upon both sides that a title, to be good, “ should be free from litigation, palpable defects, and grave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. In re the Estate of BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Reynolds v. BorelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hardenbergh v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Rubin v. FuchsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API