Legal Opinion
ARMENDAREZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2008No. ID 3626PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 646
(BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3626 Matter of Andres ARMENDAREZ-Mendez, Respondent File A014 720 015 - Laredo Decided October 6, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Pursuant to
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) (2008), the Board of Immigration Appeals lacks authority to reopen removal, deportation, or exclusion proceedings–whether on motion of an alien or sua sponte–if the alien has departed the United States after those administrative proceedings have been completed. FOR RESPONDENT: Fred Kowalski, Esquire, Brownsville,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sergio Lugo-Resendez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Luna v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Coyt v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Contreras-Bocanegra v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.