Legal Opinion
Contreras-Bocanegra v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2012No. 10-9500PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion On Rehearing En Banc
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We granted en banc rehearing of this case to determine whether the so-called post-departure bar regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) remains valid in this circuit considering Congress’ 1996 amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). The amended Act grants noncitizens the right to file one motion to reopen their immigration proceedings. However, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) contends that it lacks jurisdiction to consider motions to reopen filed by individuals who have already departed the United States, despite the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Cordova-Soto v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.