Legal Opinion
K.L. v. Edgar
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 12, 1996No. 92 C 5722Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint and to strike paragraphs 27, 28, 29, and 30 of the second amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, the court denies defendants’ motions.
A. Motion to dismiss
Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, contending that it fails to allege adequately that a system-wide policy of defendants has deprived plaintiffs of a constitutional right, or that the named class representatives have been deprived of a right as a result of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.