Department of Mental Hygiene v. Dunham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In settling the first account and report of the guardian of the estate, the court allowed the American Research Bureau the sum of $4,000 for services rendered the incompetent in locating him. From this order the Department of Mental Hygiene (hereinafter referred to as the department), as a creditor of the estate, appeals.
Frank O’Donnell, the incompetent, was committed to the Mendocino State Hospital several years ago, as in intemperate, and has been a patient of the hospitals of the department ever since. He had two sisters, or half-sisters, Hazel Ryker and May Dunham. On April 28, 1946,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Estate of ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Rowe v. Yuba CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merrick v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Lackmann v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burchell v. StrubeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Risse v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.