Legal Opinion

Burchell v. Strube

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1955No. S. F. 18780PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an interpleader action which held the appellant's claim to be barred under the defensive plea of res judicata.

Walter C. Cox is in the business of heir-hunting. Lucy Falkner, Charles J. C. Strube, and Reinhold Strube were the heirs of Charles G. Moore. Cox obtained written assignments of 40 per cent of each heir’s interest in Moore’s estate in consideration for his having revealed the existence of the estate and his promise to devote his time and incur the expense of investigating and procuring proof of their relationship to the decedent. While the estate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Simmons v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Estate of AuslenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Freeman v. TraylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Estate of PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Hersch v. Boston InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API