Legal Opinion

Vanguard Insurance v. Clarke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1991No. Docket 87772; Calendar 4PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

The sole issue presented concerns whether this Court should adopt the theory of dual or concurrent causation in the context of insurance liability. The problem of concurrent causation arises "[wjhen an insured cause joins with one or more additional causes, which may be uninsured . . . ,”1 The question in such cases is whether the convergence of causes should defeat an insurance policy exclusion.

A minority of courts in foreign jurisdictions *466have applied the concurrent causation theory to impose insurance liability notwithstanding an explicit policy exclusion. These cases involve the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NikkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Roslyn E. Kellman, Skender Bajrami, Individually and Doing Business as Kopliku Painting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. MastersMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API