Legal Opinion
McKusick v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 2001No. Docket 221171PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right, and defendant Travelers Indemnity Company cross appeals, from an order granting Travelers summary disposition, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), in this garnishment action. We affirm.
Plaintiffs William F. McKusick and Faye L. Tietz were employed by Polaris Industries in Osceola, Wisconsin. In the course of their employment, a high-pressure hose delivery system used to carry polyhydroxyl resin and toluene diisocyanate (tdi) in the manufacture of polyurethane flexible foam failed, causing plaintiffs to be exposed to and injured by tdi, a highly toxic substance.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NikkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Roslyn E. Kellman, Skender Bajrami, Individually and Doing Business as Kopliku Painting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Western World Insurance Co. v. Mary ArmbrusterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Hastings Mutual Insurance v. Safety King, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- English v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Apana v. TIG InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.