Legal Opinion

March v. Pantaleo

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1935No. Sac. 4926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a ranch near Riverbank, California. Vito Clarizio was the owner of the property prior to the transactions which led to the present controversy. He had previously, in 1925, borrowed money from plaintiff March, and given a deed of trust to .secure the loan. A reconveyance of the property was made, and on December 14, 1930, Clarizio executed a new deed of trust to plaintiff, to secure a loan of $650. The first of these deeds of trust was recorded, and the satisfaction and reconveyance thereof also appeared of record. The subsequent instrument was not recorded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ocean Shore Railroad v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Chapman v. OstergardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Fidelity Thrift & Loan Ass'n v. ALLIANCE BK.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Jones v. Independent Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API