Legal Opinion

Messick v. Houx Bros., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1930No. Docket No. 3866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action to recover a balance alleged due for goods sold and delivered. The complaint is in two counts. The first count alleges a balance due plaintiffs on their own account and the second count is upon an assigned claim. Judgment went for plaintiffs on both counts and defendant appeals from the said judgment and the whole thereof.

Three points are raised by appellants, as follows: 1. That plaintiffs have no right to maintain the action by reason of their noncompliance with sections 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code; 2. That the assignor of plaintiffs in the second…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Cook v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Spreckels v. Grace Darling Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Brown v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kimber v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Jeffery v. VolbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Smith v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Folden v. LobrovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Russ v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API