Cook v. Fowler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Defendants appeal from a final judgment against them and in favor of plaintiffs for five hundred and sixty-one dollars and seventy-five cents and costs upon a promissory note made by defendants. There is no statement or bill of exceptions.
There is but a single point made by appellant. It is that the complaint shows that plaintiffs were copartners under a designation not showing the names of the persons interested as partners, and that they have failed to aver or prove a compliance with the provisions of sec*90tions 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code, by filing and publishing a certificate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Nicholson v. Auburn Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Jeffery v. VolbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Quan Wye v. Chin Lin HeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilson v. Yegen Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.