Legal Opinion

Cook v. Fowler

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1894No. 19220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

Defendants appeal from a final judgment against them and in favor of plaintiffs for five hundred and sixty-one dollars and seventy-five cents and costs upon a promissory note made by defendants. There is no statement or bill of exceptions.

There is but a single point made by appellant. It is that the complaint shows that plaintiffs were copartners under a designation not showing the names of the persons interested as partners, and that they have failed to aver or prove a compliance with the provisions of sec*90tions 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code, by filing and publishing a certificate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Nicholson v. Auburn Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Jeffery v. VolbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Quan Wye v. Chin Lin HeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wilson v. Yegen Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API