Legal Opinion
Bowden v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 18, 2016No. 14-14-00955-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
Tracy Christopher, Justice
When we decided this case on original submission, we held that appellant, by not objecting in the trial court, had failed to preserve error on his complaint that a portion of his mandatory court costs amounted to an unconstitutional taking. See Bowden v. State, No. 14-14-00955-CR, 2016 WL 1128182, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 22, 2016) (mem. op., not designated for publication), vacated, No. PD-0394-16, 2016 WL 4938245 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 14, 2016) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). Relying on this court’s decision in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Pan American Production Co. v. City of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armin Glenn Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Damonte Bonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Anthony Paul MacHina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2020
- Belisario I. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- D'Warren Lamar Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.