Damonte Bonds v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION 1
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
Appellant Damonte Bonds raises two court-costs issues in this appeal from his aggravated-robbery conviction. He asserts that (1) he was not provided a bill of court costs as required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001 and (2) assessing court costs under Texas Local Government Code section 133.102 is a taking that violates the Texas Constitution and United States Constitution. We affirm.
Background
Appellant pleaded “guilty” to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and was convicted of that offense. The trial court sentenced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Bowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016