Legal Opinion

Damonte Bonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 2016No. 14-15-00688-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION 1

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

Appellant Damonte Bonds raises two court-costs issues in this appeal from his aggravated-robbery conviction. He asserts that (1) he was not provided a bill of court costs as required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001 and (2) assessing court costs under Texas Local Government Code section 133.102 is a taking that violates the Texas Constitution and United States Constitution. We affirm.

Background

Appellant pleaded “guilty” to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and was convicted of that offense. The trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Bowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Antonio Julio Hernandez-Faced v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API