Armin Glenn Ingram v. State

OPINION

LEE GABRIEL, JUSTICE

Appellant Armin Glenn Ingram appeals from his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a young child (CSA) and from his conviction for indecency with a child by contact. Appellant also attacks a cost designated for child-abuse prevention and a consolidated court cost that were imposed in the judgment' regarding his conviction for CSA. We affirm thp trial court’s judgments. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(a).

I.BACKGROUND

Appellant was charged in a seven-count indictment with CSA and with indecency with a child by contact. A jury found him guilty of these two offenses and…