Legal Opinion
United States v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 6, 2003No. C-3-99-093PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS. (DOC.134).
ROSE, District Judge.
This‘matter is before the Court for decision on Defendant United Technologies Corporation’s Motion for Reconsideration of its Summary Judgment Motions. (Doc. 134). As the instant case involves the Pratt & Whitney division of United Technologies, the Court will refer to the defendant as “United Technologies” and “Pratt” interchangeably. Defendant’s motion requests the reconsideration of six motions, the first being one that claimed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Romele Lavelle GatewoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- U.S. Ex Rel. Lamers v. City of Green BayDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. RoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. Medica-Rents Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- US Ex Rel. Miller v. BILL HARBERT INTERN. CONST.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.