Legal Opinion
U.S. Ex Rel. Lamers v. City of Green Bay
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 13, 1998No. 95-C-684PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Relator Allen Lamers, an officer of Lamers Bus Lines, Inc. (“Lamers”), brings this action on behalf of the United States pursuant to the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b). Lamers alleges that the City of Green Bay (“City”), which owns and operates Green Bay Transit (“GBT”), made false statements and representations to the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) in order to obtain annual FTA grant funds and to avoid repayment of improperly received grant funds in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(2) and (7). According to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Karvelas v. Melrose-Wakefield HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. The Limited, Inc. Tarrant Apparel GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGHCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States Ex Rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.