Legal Opinion
United States v. Medica-Rents Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 23, 2003No. 3:00-cr-00483PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE UNITED STATES’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions: (1) defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #277-1], filed November 15, 2002; and (2) plaintiff United States of America (“United States”)’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [doc. # 272-1], filed November 18. Having carefully considered the motions, responses, replies, and supplemental information, the Court concludes that the United States’s motion should be DENIED and the defendants’…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Taylor v. GabelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Gudur v. Deloitte Consulting LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Visiting Nurse Ass'n of Brooklyn v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
- United States Ex Rel. Roberts v. Aging Care Home Health, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.