Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine Workers
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beennan
The question for decision in this case is whether an international union, which neither instigates, supports, ratifies, nor encourages “wildcat” strikes engaged in by local unions in violation of a collective-bargaining agreement, may be held hable in damages to an affected employer if the union did not use all reasonable means available to it to prevent the strikes or bring about their termination.
Petitioner, Carbon Fuel Co., and respondent United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) were parties to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements of 1968 and 1971, collective-bargaining agreements…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brenner v. Local 514, United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.