Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Von Hamm
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1927No. Docket No. 5831PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), P. J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to a fourth amended complaint, without leave to amend. The action was brought in California against a father for injuries resulting from an alleged tort of his minor child, which occurred at the residence of the father in the territory of Hawaii.
The complaint was filed April 26, 1924, and alleges that plaintiff “is, and . . . has been a resident of the state of California,” and that the defendant is a resident of the territory of Hawaii, and is the father of two minor children named…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Ellis v. D'AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Price v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Assurance Co. of America v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.