Legal Opinion

Price v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1954No. L. A. 22934PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This case presents the question of the availability in California of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as a ground for refusal by a court to exercise jurisdiction over a cause of action which arose outside the state’s boundaries. We have concluded that upon a proper showing and within the limitations imposed by the privileges and immunities clause of the federal Constitution (art. IV, § 2) the doctrine may be applied in this state.

Plaintiff filed this action in the superior court in Los Angeles, under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API