Price v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
This case presents the question of the availability in California of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as a ground for refusal by a court to exercise jurisdiction over a cause of action which arose outside the state’s boundaries. We have concluded that upon a proper showing and within the limitations imposed by the privileges and immunities clause of the federal Constitution (art. IV, § 2) the doctrine may be applied in this state.
Plaintiff filed this action in the superior court in Los Angeles, under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.