Malik v. Universal Resources Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEEKS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action charging defendants with sundry violations of federal securities law, 1 California State Corpora tions Code 2 and Civil Code 3 provisions and California common law. 4 This Court’s jurisdiction over the federal claims is conferred by § 22 of the 1933 Securities Act and § 27 of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, and the state causes of action are cognizable under pendent jurisdiction. 5
FACTS
Plaintiffs Fazley Malik, Orest Chaykow-sky, Morton Barish and Thomas Coor invested in common stock and 7% convertible debentures issued by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,462 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernard Jay CovenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Hudson v. Capital Management International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1983
- In Re Diasonics Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Zatkin v. PrimuthDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.