Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Capital Management International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 7, 1983No. C-81-1737-MHPPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action is brought pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934, 15 U.S. §§ 77a-77bbbb, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-78kk, and state law. Plaintiffs Bleehman and Robert and Shirley Hudson invested in limited partnerships entitled Delta Greenhouse, Ltd. and California Flowerland ’79, respectively. Plaintiffs allege that these limited partnerships were sold as part of a complex fraudulent scheme spanning a period from approximately 1973 to 1980 involving sales of interests in forty-five Flowerland limited partnerships to more than 2,300…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gunnells v. Healthplan Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- National Union Fire Insurance v. DeloachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.