Legal Opinion
Staminski v. Romeo
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas M. Stark, J.
In this article 78 proceeding petitioner seeks a judgment reversing and annulling two determinations made by respondent Board of Appeals on December 5, 1968. The first was a grant of a special permit for the erection of an antenna mast or pole by respondent Suffolk Cable Corp. on premises leased by it from respondent Jack Rogers, and the second was a grant of a height variance authorizing a maximum antenna height of 185 feet.
The premises in question are located in an area classified “J” Business 1 District (Neighborhood Business) by the Brookhaven Town Zoning Ordinance and Map. The structure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Pruzan v. RedmanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Ceracche Television Corp. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Harper v. City of KingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- City of New York v. Comtel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by10 opinions
- TCG New York, Inc. v. City of White Plains, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Capitol Cable, Inc. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Mammina v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CortlandtNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Devon-Aire Villas Home. v. Americable Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.