Legal Opinion
Harper v. City of Kingston
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction. Petitioner Walter Beade, Jr., moves for permission to intervene as a party plaintiff. Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings.
Defendant, Kingston Cablevision, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “ Cablevision”, was incorporated, pursuant to section 3 of the Transportation Corporations Law, to construct, operate and maintain a community antenna system within the County of Ulster; to construct, operate and maintain wires, cables, amplifiers, towers, electronic equipment and other…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ziegler v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hudson River Telephone Co. v. Watervliet Turnpike & Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Barhite v. Home Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Village of Carthage v. Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- TC Systems, Inc. v. Town of Colonie, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Staminski v. RomeoNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Nelson v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People's Cable Corp. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.