Legal Opinion

Harchick v. Baio

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1989No. 55244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Corrigan, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, George M. and Rose Harchick, appeal from an order granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Barbara L. Baio, and assign two errors for our review. As we find one of the assignments of error to be well-taken, we reverse.

I

On July 13, 1983, George Harchick was involved in an automobile accident with Barbara Baio. The next day, William Harris, a claims representative for Baio’s insurer, Westfield Insurance Co., requested that Harchick meet with him.

Harris conducted a tape-recorded interview of Harchick at this meeting and the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Morris v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Picklesimer v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ohio, Dept. of Public Welfare v. LicsakOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carr v. Armstrong Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  2. Coburn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Pizzino v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Flemmings v. KnisleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Lutzick v. BentzenOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API