Legal Opinion

Pizzino v. Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1994No. 65674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Cindy Pizzino appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant-appellant Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company (“Lightning Rod”). The appellant seeks to set aside a release entered into with her insurer, Lightning Rod, as a result of an accident with an uninsured motorist. Subsequent to the execution of the release, the appellant learned that she had suffered a herniated disk in her back.

At her deposition, the appellant stated that on October 6, 1991, at 10:00 or 11:00 p.m., she was proceeding east on Trowbridge Avenue when…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scotts Co. LLC v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. Coburn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Lutzick v. BentzenOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API