Legal Opinion

Hull v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2005No. 49A02-0504-CR-298PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Richard Hull appeals from his sentence after he pleaded guilty to two counts of Murder. He presents three issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether Hull was denied due process because the sentence imposed upon resentencing after appeal was greater than that imposed at his original sentencing.

2. Whether the trial court violated Hull's Sixth Amendment right to have aggravating factors determined by a jury.

3. Whether his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and his character.

The State raises one issue on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. McCann v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bacher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Cruite v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API