Legal Opinion

Gutermuth v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2006No. 10A01-0509-CR-410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

In this belated appeal, Warren Guter-muth challenges his twenty-four-year aggregate sentence for three counts of class C felony child molesting. We affirm.

Issues

We restate the two issues Gutermuth presents as follows:

I. Whether he may challenge his sentence pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); and

II. Whether the trial court properly sentenced him.

Facts and Procedural History

Between June and October 1995, Earl and Dorinda Riley and their three children lived with the eighty-one-year-old Guter-muth in his…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Witt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Boyle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Green v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. David Boyle v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API