Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Perry v. Raacke

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 1, 1953No. File 91013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

This was an action of quo warranto, to be decided upon an agreed statement of facts. The basic claim of the plaintiff is that No. 195 of the Special Acts of 1935 (22 Spec. Laws 114), entitled “An Act Providing for Biennial Elections in the Town of New Fairfield, never became actually operative because of a failure properly to carry out the so-called referendum provisions of § 7 of that act.

As indicated by its title, the act purported to establish biennial elections in New Fairfield. But by its terms it did not become operative to regulate terms of office and elections until the town election…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Anselmo v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ribeiro v. Town of AndoverConnecticut Superior Court · 1955
  2. Arras v. Regional School District No. 14Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  3. Ketchale v. Unger, No. 396218 (Jul. 15, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API