Legal Opinion

Middleton v. City of Watertown

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1944No. File No. 8737PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicker, J.

The plaintiff is a lineman employed by the city of Watertown, defendant, in the operation of its municipal light plant. The South Dakota Employers Protective Association, defendant, insured the liability of the city under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On December 18, 1939, Middleton was injured by the fall of a pole. The injuries consisted of a broken left knee and a bruised right knee. They resulted in total disability until April 1st, 1940, when he returned to work. Some time later he was taken to a hospital for an operation to remove a plate. Another operation was performed about March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Chittenden v. JarvisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ogden City v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bailey v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Moody v. LW Tyler, Custom CombinersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Salmon v. Denhart ElevatorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API