Perroni v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice
While I agree ustice, to support a finding of contempt in this case, the majority has sidestepped the more critical issue in failing to address Mr. Perroni’s arguments in regard to recusal. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, I believe that Judge Fox should have recused. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
The majority gives short shrift to Mr. Perroni’s recusal argument. While the allegations contained in Mr. Perroni’s motion for recusal are recited, the majority opinion is bereft of the facts and circumstances underlying the motion. Instead, after reciting our well-settled…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Jacksonville v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Southern Farmers Assn., Inc. v. WyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.