Placke v. Pinnell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff was the losing party in an action tried by the court without a jury (L. A. No. 16290). Plaintiff moved for a new trial. The motion was denied on November 23,1936, and notice of this ruling was served on plaintiff’s counsel on November 24th. On December 17, 1936, plaintiff filed a request for transcript pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Because the request was not filed within the time specified by said section, within ten days after notice of order denying new trial, the court refused to settle the transcript. Plaintiff thereupon moved for relief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Stenzel v. KronickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Atowich v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Callaway v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kester Motors, Inc. v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952