Legal Opinion
Mead v. Lindlaw
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1063PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Mead, proceeding pro se, filed suit against Defendants William Lind-law, Bruce Finland, Joel Aronson, Dorothy Bridges, Alison Rind, Ebelechukwu Agba, Edward Furash, City First Bank of D.C., N.A. (“City First Bank”), and MED Developers, LLC (collectively “Defendants”), asserting seven claims relating to certain loans taken out by Plaintiff and the subsequent foreclosure and auction of Plaintiffs property. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ [6] Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lurensky v. WellinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Boyd v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.