Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0889PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
[Dkt. ## 7, 11, 13]
RICHARD J. LEON United States District Judge
Before the Court are three motions. The first two motions, filed by defendants Dennis Gingold (“defendant Gingold”) and Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP (“defendant Kilpatrick”), request dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of standing. See [Dkts. # 7, 11]. The third motion, filed by plaintiff John W. Boyd Jr. (“Boyd” or “plaintiff’), argues that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and requests that this action be remanded to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Harold Martin v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- News World Communications, Inc. v. ThompsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Simon v. HofgardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Nytes v. Trustify, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Smith v. HendricksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Colon v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Arenivar v. Manganaro Midatlantic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.