Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Borax Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 19, 1959No. C.D. 2068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is an action for the recovery of excess duties alleged to have been assessed against an importation of metal soap dispensers. The merchandise in question was assessed with duty at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of iron or steel.

The following alternative claims for classification of the instant dispensers have been advanced by plaintiffs in their protest or by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. Protest 800468-G of Foxboro Co.United States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Impact Container Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Israel Creations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Nord Light, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API