Legal Opinion

F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 13, 1956No. C. D. 1832PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

So-called “protective cream dispensers” were classified by the collector of customs as articles wholly or in chief value of metal in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that the subject merchandise should be classified as “machines” in paragraph 372 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372), as modified by the Torquay protocol to said general agreement, 86 Treas.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Pacific Coast Borax Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API