Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
La ween ce, Judge:
Plaintiff claims that certain new metal drums,imported empty, should have been classified pursuant to the provisions. *177in paragraph. 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 328), as modified by the supplement to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 85 Treas. Dec. 64, T. D. 52423, and subjected to duty at the rate of 12}( per centum ad valorem.
The collector of customs classified the importation as hollowware which is provided for in paragraph 339 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 339), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. GarramoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Braun Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. BeneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Protest 800468-G of Foxboro Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Coast Borax Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Impact Container Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Glidden Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Impact Container Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- McLaughlin Agricultural Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955