Legal Opinion
Hiersche v. Seamless Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 21, 1963No. Civ. 63-219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Defendant, Seamless, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut has moved to quash the service, on the Corporation Commissioner of the State of Oregon, of the process issued in this cause.
To resolve the question, the Court must: (1) inquire into the nature of the business, if any, transacted in Oregon by the defendant, Seamless, and (2) inquire into and construe the provisions of Chapter 352, Oregon Laws, 1963.
The evidence presented supports the following findings:
1. Seamless is engaged in the manufacture of a Speargun known as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Waukesha Building Corporation v. JamesonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.