Legal Opinion
Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. Hollingsworth
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1969No. 22826_1PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal challenges the in personam jurisdiction of the District Court of the District of Hawaii over Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd., a corporation engaged in the manufacturing of motor bodies in England.1 The court concluded that since the action was founded on diversity of citizenship, the amenability of Duple to suit would depend on Hawaii law and that Duple was personally subject to the court’s jurisdiction under Hawaii’s “long-arm” statute by virtue of out-of-state service of process as there provided.2 *233The claim of the plaintiffs-appellees against appellant is one of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Amba Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Jobar International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Thompson v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.