Legal Opinion
Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. LeMay
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 30, 1981No. C-3-80-362PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON MOTIONS; COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT WARNICK’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OVERRULED; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL FROM PIER, INC., BE PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE SUSTAINED; DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY SUSTAINED
RICE, District Judge.
This matter is before this Court upon three motions, to wit:(1) the motion by the counterclaim Defendant David L. War nick for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(e);(2) the Plaintiffs’ motion for an order that certain documents obtained by Defendants’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zerpol Corp. v. DMP Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- Rowlin v. Alabama Dep't of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Davidson v. Yihai CaoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Caruso v. Coleman Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.