Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Santaquin City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1933No. 5488PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On petition of plaintiffs an alternative writ of prohibition was issued out of this court prohibiting and restraining the defendants from issuing and selling revenue bonds of the defendant city pursuant to an ordinance theretofore passed and adopted by the city council of Santaquin City. The issues are made by demurrer to the petition, which alleges that the petition does not set forth any cause of action or sufficient ground to warrant the making of the writ of prohibition permanent.

At the hearing of this case the court also heard arguments on the pending motion for rehearing in the case of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Walton v. Tracy Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API