Hockman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
Appellant Michael Hockman challenges the denial of his motion to vacate sentence and set aside judgment and for new trial based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, D.C.Code § 23-110 (1981). 1 He contends he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel because errors by his trial counsel adversely affected what could have been a compelling self-defense case, and consequently the trial cannot be relied upon as having produced a just result. Specifically, Hockman points to his trial counsel’s failures (1) to move to suppress…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ellerbe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gillis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Artis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Junior v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.