Legal Opinion

Hockman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1986No. 79-1006, 85-722PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Appellant Michael Hockman challenges the denial of his motion to vacate sentence and set aside judgment and for new trial based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, D.C.Code § 23-110 (1981). 1 He contends he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel because errors by his trial counsel adversely affected what could have been a compelling self-defense case, and consequently the trial cannot be relied upon as having produced a just result. Specifically, Hockman points to his trial counsel’s failures (1) to move to suppress…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ellerbe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Gillis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Artis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Junior v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API