Legal Opinion

Gillis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1991No. 88-401 & 90-22PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Gillis was convicted of eleven counts of assault with a deadly weapon and one count of carrying a pistol without a license. In this consolidated appeal, Gillis contends that the trial court erred in giving an aiding and abetting instruction and in summarily denying his motion under D.C. Code § 23-110 (1989 Repl.). In his collateral appeal, Gillis contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to exclude certain incriminating evidence and failed to develop an available defense. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Gaston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Blakeney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ginyard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API